Cumhuritey: A Century of Independent Journalism in Turkey


In the heart of Istanbul, amidst the echoes of fallen empires and rising republics, a newspaper was born in 1924. Cumhuritey, meaning “The Republic,” is more than just a news source; it’s a chronicle of Turkey’s journey. Founded on the principles of secularism and unwavering independent thought, Cumhuritey has become an emblem of democracy, a relentless critic of power, and a symbol of resilience in a country with a complex relationship with press freedom.

1. What is Cumhuritey? A brief definition and why it matters in Turkish history.

Cumhuritey is a Turkish daily newspaper founded in 1924. More than just a source of news, it’s a pillar of the Turkish Republic, fearlessly advocating for secularism and offering a critical lens on the nation’s politics. Its unwavering independent stance has been essential in shaping Turkey’s democratic journey.

Why is Cumhuritey Important?

  • Voice of the Republic: Founded as the Ottoman Empire crumbled, Cumhuritey became a leading force in establishing Turkey’s secular, modern identity.
  • Defender of Democracy Throughout Turkey’s history, Cumhuritey has challenged authoritarian tendencies, holding those in power to account.
  • Symbol of Resilience: Despite censorship attempts and pressure, Cumhuritey endures, symbolizing the ongoing fight for press freedom in Turkey. 

2. History of Cumhuritey

Cumhuritey’s Birth in a New Nation

Cumhuritey, meaning “The Republic,” is a prominent Turkish daily newspaper with a storied history intertwined with modern Turkey. It was founded in Istanbul on May 7, 1924, by Yunus Nadi Abalıoğlu, a journalist and close associate of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, the revolutionary founder of the Republic of Turkey.  Cumhuritey emerged in the dynamic and transformative era following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and the birth of Turkey as a secular republic.

Key Conditions of Early Republican Turkey Shaping Cumhuritey

  • Rise of Turkish Nationalism: The fall of the Ottoman Empire spurred a strong sense of Turkish nationalism. Cumhuritey reflected this, promoting a unified Turkish identity and the ideals of the new republic.
  • Emphasis on Secularism: Atatürk’s reforms aimed to modernize Turkey and separate religion from the state. Cumhuritey became a vocal champion of secularism, often critical of religious influence on politics.
  • Single-Party Rule: Mustafa Kemal Atatürk’s Republican People’s Party (CHP) held unchallenged power during Cumhuritey’s early years. While initially aligned with the CHP, Cumhuritey gradually moved towards a more critical and independent stance.
  • Nation-building and Westernization: The Turkish Republic sought to establish a strong, modern state with a Western orientation. Cumhuritey played an important role in disseminating information, promoting Atatürk’s reforms, and shaping public opinion.

Prominent Figures in Cumhuritey’s Early History

  • Yunus Nadi Abalıoğlu: Cumhuritey’s founder, a respected journalist, and staunch Atatürk supporter.
  • İlhan Selçuk: A renowned columnist and intellectual who served as editor-in-chief and led the newspaper until his death in 2010.
  • Hasan Cemal: A prominent Cumhuritey journalist and grandson of a founding member of modern Turkey.

Cumhuritey’s Evolution Alongside Turkey’s Political Landscape

Cumhuritey has weathered Turkey’s often turbulent political climate, its editorial stance evolving over time. Here are key milestones:

  • Atatürk Era (1924-1938): Supportive of Atatürk’s reforms and the CHP, while promoting secularism, republicanism, and Turkish nationalism.
  • Multi-Party Era (1945 onward): Cumhuritey adopted a more critical and independent position, particularly during periods of political and social tension.
  • Military Coups: Turkey experienced several military interventions (1960, 1971, 1980). Cumhuritey often faced pressure and censorship during these periods for its opposition to military rule.
  • Rise of Political Islam: Cumhuritey maintained its secularist stance, becoming a critic of the rise of political Islamic movements in Turkey.
  • 21st Century: The newspaper remains a vocal advocate for democracy, secularism, and human rights in the face of political challenges and increasing government pressure.

Censorship and Suppression Throughout Cumhuritey’s History

Cumhuritey has a history of facing pressure, censorship, and even violence due to its critical stances. Here are some notable examples:

  • State Censorship: Cumhuritey has been periodically censored by various Turkish governments, for its critical coverage of political affairs or its secularist views.
  • Legal Pressure: Journalists have faced lawsuits and imprisonment for their work at Cumhuritey, particularly when reporting on sensitive topics.
  • Attacks on Journalists: Several Cumhuritey journalists have been assassinated over the years, most likely due to their critical writings.

3. Cumhuritey’s Influence and Editorial Stance

Championing Secularism: The Practical Implications

Cumhuritey holds a central position as a defender of secularism in Turkey, a country with a complex relationship between religion and the state. This stance manifests in several ways:

  • Critical Scrutiny of Religious Influence on Politics: Cumhuritey routinely investigates and reports on potential encroachment of religious agendas into government and public institutions.
  • Advocacy for Separation of Religion and State: The newspaper consistently promotes the principle that religion should be a private matter and the state should remain neutral in religious affairs.
  • Defense of Minority Rights: Cumhuritey highlights the rights of religious minorities in Turkey, particularly non-Muslim communities and secular segments within the Muslim population.
  • Promotion of Science and Rationalism: Articles emphasize scientific perspectives and critical reasoning, often challenging traditional or religiously-influenced viewpoints.

Notable Examples of Investigative Journalism and Commentary

  • Corruption Exposés: Cumhuritey has a strong tradition of uncovering corruption in political and business circles, leading to high-profile resignations and legal consequences.
  • Criticism of Authoritarianism: The newspaper has fearlessly criticized authoritarian tendencies of Turkish governments, regardless of political orientation.
  • Human Rights Advocacy: Cumhuritey consistently brings attention to human rights abuses, such as restrictions on freedom of expression, minority rights violations, and police brutality.
  • Defense of Democracy: Particularly during periods of political crisis, Cumhuritey has acted as a guardian of democratic principles and the rule of law.

Cumhuritey’s Influence on Public Debates and Policy

Cumhuritey’s bold reporting and commentary shape public discourse in Turkey. Here’s how:

  • Setting the Agenda: Its investigations often spark national debates and force authorities to address issues that might have otherwise been ignored.
  • Shifting Public Opinion: Cumhuritey’s editorials and analysis provide alternative viewpoints, challenging dominant narratives and influencing public opinion on crucial matters.
  • Policy Impact: While not always achieving direct policy changes, Cumhuritey’s reporting puts pressure on policymakers, contributing to long-term shifts in public attitudes and political priorities.

Controversies and Impact

Cumhuritey’s unwavering stance has made it a target, but also amplifies its influence:

  • Ergenekon Trials: Reporting on the alleged “Ergenekon” network (a supposed ultra-nationalist deep state) led to the jailing of many journalists, while ultimately fueling debates about military and judicial power.
  • Charlie Hebdo Caricatures: Publishing controversial Charlie Hebdo cartoons after the 2015 Paris attacks led to protests and legal scrutiny, highlighting tensions over free speech and secularism.

Comparing Cumhuritey: Secularism in Turkish and European Newspapers

  • Turkish Context: While some Turkish newspapers support secularism, few are as consistently outspoken as Cumhuritey. It faces greater risks due to Turkey’s history of suppressing dissent.
  • Historical European Parallels: Cumhuritey’s staunch secularism can be compared to some anti-clerical European newspapers of the 19th and early 20th centuries, which challenged the Church’s political power.

4. Historical Comparisons

Throughout history, newspapers driven by an independent spirit have emerged as beacons of critical thought, often at great personal and professional risk for their staff. Here are a few comparisons to draw with Cumhuritey:

  • The Washington Post (USA): A parallel can be drawn with the Post’s tenacious reporting on the Watergate scandal, ultimately leading to President Nixon’s resignation. Like Cumhuritey, it faced government pressure and threats, proving the watchdog role of the press in a democracy.
  • Novaya Gazeta (Russia): This modern Russian newspaper operates in a far more authoritarian context. Its history of critical investigative journalism, uncovering corruption and human rights abuses, has led to the assassination of several journalists. This makes their bravery and Cumhuritey’s continued resistance even more remarkable.
  • The Guardian (UK): Known for its left-leaning editorial stance, The Guardian has often been at odds with governments. Its investigative work and commitment to holding power accountable resonate with Cumhuritey’s mission.

Different Contexts

It’s crucial to highlight the varying circumstances these newspapers operated within:

  • Democratic Safeguards: Papers like The Washington Post and The Guardian benefit from stronger democratic institutions and legal protections for the press, though these guarantees can be tested.
  • Authoritarian Backdrop: Cumhuritey and Novaya Gazeta’s oppositional stance is far more dangerous due to the greater potential for state-sponsored violence and a lack of legal recourse.


  • The Oak Tree: Representing deeply rooted strength and resilience, an oak tree withstands harsh weather yet remains unyielding, much like Cumhuritey in its century-long battle against censorship.
  • The Lighthouse: A beacon cutting through darkness and guiding ships to safety. This reflects Cumhuritey’s role in illuminating critical issues and challenging propaganda, acting as a guiding light in a complex political landscape.
  • The Dissenting Voice: Even when lone voices are drowned out by a powerful majority, they hold a unique moral authority. Cumhuritey often embodies this, speaking uncomfortable truths to those in power.

5. Cumhuritey in Modern Turkey

Circulation & Readership

Cumhuritey’s print circulation is relatively modest compared to some mainstream Turkish newspapers. However, its influence lies in its agenda-setting power and dedicated readership.

Cumhuritey’s primary readers tend to be well-educated, urban-dwelling secularists, intellectuals, and those critical of Turkey’s current government. It’s a bastion for a segment of society deeply invested in Atatürk’s ideals and concerned about democratic backsliding.

Digital Presence

  • Website and Social Media: Cumhuritey has a strong online presence with an active website and social media channels. This has significantly expanded its reach and engagement, particularly with younger generations.
  • Digital Adaptation: While initially slower to embrace digital platforms, Cumhuritey has accelerated its adaptation. Its online presence is essential for news dissemination and commentary, especially when the print edition faces pressure.

Ongoing Controversies

  • Political Pressure: Cumhuritey continues to be a prime target for government criticism due to its vocal oppositional stance. Journalists face lawsuits, imprisonment threats, and the pressure of potential fines levied against the newspaper.
  • Competition from Pro-Government Media: An increasingly dominant pro-government media landscape poses a challenge. These outlets often attack Cumhuritey, creating a hostile environment for independent journalism.
  • Economic Hardships: Turkey’s economic woes add financial strain to Cumhuritey, mirroring challenges faced by independent newspapers globally.

Evolving Stance

While Cumhuritey’s core values of secularism, republicanism, and democracy remain firm, there have been subtle nuances in its stance over time:

  • Balancing Criticism and Pragmatism: Cumhuritey walks a fine line between relentless criticism of the government and pragmatic acknowledgement of the country’s political reality, in the search for continued survival.
  • Diversification of Voices: While maintaining its ideological core, Cumhuritey has given more space to diverse, and sometimes younger, columnists who offer varied perspectives while still generally aligning with the overall editorial stance.

Public Perception

Cumhuritey’s public perception is deeply polarized along Turkey’s political divides:

  • Loyal Supporters: Revered as a beacon of secularist values, a watchdog against power, and a defender of Atatürk’s legacy.
  • Government and Supporters: Viewed with hostility, often labeled as elitist, out-of-touch, and relentlessly oppositional for its own sake.

Sources for Public Perception

  • Opinion Polls: Polls focusing on media trust or political leanings can shed light on how different demographics view Cumhuritey.
  • Academic Analyses: Studies on Turkish media often discuss Cumhuritey’s role and public perception.


Why Cumhuritey Still Matters: In Turkey and Beyond

Cumhuritey stands as a testament to the enduring power of independent journalism.  While it operates within Turkey’s unique sociopolitical context, its story resonates beyond borders:

  • Defense of Core Values: In an era where democratic principles, secularism, and press freedom are challenged globally, Cumhuritey’s steadfast defense of these ideals is an inspiration.
  • Voice for the Voiceless: By giving a platform to minorities, dissidents, and those critical of power, Cumhuritey champions a pluralistic society, a vital element of any healthy democracy.
  • The Fight Against Authoritarianism: Cumhuritey’s century-long history is a lesson in the constant struggle between a free press and authoritarian tendencies that exist, to varying degrees, in many nations.

A Model with Caveats

Cumhuritey’s uncompromising stance might not be directly replicable everywhere.  Factors like Turkey’s specific history, political landscape, and deep polarization shape its approach. However, elements of its model are worth considering:

  • Commitment to Investigative Reporting: Holding power to account through in-depth reporting is essential for any media outlet seeking to serve the public interest.
  • Courage in the Face of Pressure: The willingness to confront censorship and intimidation is indispensable for watchdog journalism.

Threats to Cumhuritey’s Future

Cumhuritey’s survival is far from guaranteed.  The most pressing threats include:

  • Unsustainable Political Pressure: Constant legal battles, threats to journalists, and economic penalties could eventually force its closure.
  • Erosion of Public Trust: A hyper-polarized landscape and government-backed disinformation campaigns undermine trust in all media, including Cumhuritey.
  • Financial Sustainability: Declining revenues in a changing media landscape pose a challenge common to many independent outlets globally.

Call to Action

To truly understand Cumhuritey’s significance, explore its pages yourself:

  • Visit the Cumhuritey website: (translations may be needed)
  • Research Turkish Journalism: Delve into the broader context in which Cumhuritey operates. Resources like Reporters Without Borders offer insights.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *